| 
   
Working from a
  toy bag implies that the home visitor’s interaction with the child for 1 hour
  a week is intervention. 
 | 
  
   
The hour is
  better spent working with the parents, because adults can benefit from 1-hour,
  weekly sessions. 
 | 
 
| 
   
The toy bag
  implies that what the family has is inadequate. 
 | 
  
   
The home visit
  should be, in part, about reassuring families’ of their competence. 
 | 
 
| 
   
If the toys
  are so important, why are they removed at the end of the visit? 
 | 
  
   
The home visit
  should prepare the family to intervene during all the many hours between home
  visits. 
 | 
 
| 
   
Toy bag ladies
  (and gentlemen) spend 80% of the home visit on something that consumes 5-15%
  of a child’s time: adult-child-toy play. 
 | 
  
   
Home visits
  should provide consultation to families on interventions that can happen in
  all naturally occurring routines. 
 | 
 
| 
   
Toy bag play
  tends to be adult-directed. 
 | 
  
   
Intervention
  is most effective when it follows a child’ interest. 
 | 
 
by Robin McWilliam, on topics related to the Routines-Based Model
Monday, November 28, 2011
Toy Bags Again
Banishing toy bags from home visits is both symbolic and meaningful. I have written about this issue before: http://naturalenvironments.blogspot.com/2007/10/toy-bags.html. Here's a summary: