Working from a
toy bag implies that the home visitor’s interaction with the child for 1 hour
a week is intervention.
|
The hour is
better spent working with the parents, because adults can benefit from 1-hour,
weekly sessions.
|
The toy bag
implies that what the family has is inadequate.
|
The home visit
should be, in part, about reassuring families’ of their competence.
|
If the toys
are so important, why are they removed at the end of the visit?
|
The home visit
should prepare the family to intervene during all the many hours between home
visits.
|
Toy bag ladies
(and gentlemen) spend 80% of the home visit on something that consumes 5-15%
of a child’s time: adult-child-toy play.
|
Home visits
should provide consultation to families on interventions that can happen in
all naturally occurring routines.
|
Toy bag play
tends to be adult-directed.
|
Intervention
is most effective when it follows a child’ interest.
|
by Robin McWilliam, on topics related to the Routines-Based Model
Monday, November 28, 2011
Toy Bags Again
Banishing toy bags from home visits is both symbolic and meaningful. I have written about this issue before: http://naturalenvironments.blogspot.com/2007/10/toy-bags.html. Here's a summary: