Wednesday, January 6, 2016


his post continues the 12 mental shifts I described in September—the mental shifts that have to occur to move from a clinical approach to a family-centered, functional approach. This time, the shift involves asking the question, Whose child is it anyway?
The question most often crops up when professionals and the family disagree. At least, it should crop up. The two disagreements are when families want to address something you don’t care about and when they don’t want to address something you do care about.

Families want to address something you don’t care about

Javier insisted his son, Carlos, should say please and thank you. Carlos could barely say mama and dada. The early interventionist thought there were much more functional words he should be learning next, such as more, yes, finished, eat, drink, and so on. She explained to Javier that these words could be useful in different routines and were generally easy for children to learn. She noticed, however, that Javier himself didn’t use them in playing or feeding Carlos but did model thank you and please. Then she remembered Whose child is it anyway? Not only is this a true and obvious statement but because Javier had this as a priority, he was motivated to work on it, so Carlos received the intervention frequently. Signing please and thank you do no harm and actually help Carlos learn about imitation, communication, and rituals—all important for learning and family routines.

What if Javier had wanted Carlos to use the toilet at 18 months? The early interventionist would have had an ethical obligation to provide Javier with information, which is another mantra of the Routines-BasedModel. We have an ethical obligation to provide families with information.

Families don’t want to address something you care about

Philomena is a physical therapist and is working with Rose and her family. Rose gets into a four-point position, on her hands and knees. She often then sits back on her ankles, but there’s no movement—no “creeping” on hands and knees, with the tummy off the floor. Philomena thinks this is important: It would help Rose learn about reciprocal movement and weight shifting, not to mention that it would be a more efficient way of moving than the commando crawl Rose did use. But Rose’s parents were politely lukewarm about creeping. They’d heard that many babies simply skip over creeping before learning to stand and eventually walk. Also, they didn’t like making Rose do things she didn’t want to do, and Rose had no interest in creeping, even with a towel slung under her belly and held up by an adult. Philomena incorrectly thought creeping was a prerequisite to walking; after all, it was next on the mobility developmental checklist. 

Then she remembered Whose child is it anyway? She’d given the parents information about weight shift and reciprocal movement, so she’d done her ethical duty. If the parents didn’t work on creeping, it wasn’t going to harm Rose. Even if Rose learned to move independently later than she would if she crept, so what? Early intervention doesn’t mean we have to push all skills to be learned as early as possible. If children or their caregivers aren’t interested, it’s futile to perseverate on the topic. 

A few weeks went by, when Rose’s mother said she wanted her to play more independently and for longer, so she could get dinner ready (the dreaded dinner preparation routine). Philomena worked with the mother to come up with solutions, and, on one visit, the mother said, “If it didn’t take her so long to get to her toys, she wouldn’t get fussy so quickly.” 

Philomena said, “How can we get her to be quicker? Or should we put the toys closer?”

“We need to get her moving better than that crawling she does.”

“We can certainly work on that, but that would require a grown-up with her, and you’re busy preparing dinner.”

“Maybe I can work on it when we’re just hanging out, playing in the living room,” said Rose’s mother.

“Is that a useful time for her to be able to move better?” asked Philomena.

“Yes, it’s the same issue. She can be more independent in her play.”
Asunción, Paraguay, where I recently spoke at the ORITEL Conference

This is an example of how, even when we acknowledge whose child it is, the skill might be addressed. It was only when Rose’s mother saw a functional need, for Rose to be engaged during dinner preparation, that the skill became a priority. After this conversation, perhaps even at another visit focused on play time, Philomena would have used family consultation (Mental Shift 12) to develop, with the mother, the specific intervention strategies.


Unknown said...

I plan on using these Mental Shifts at staff meetings. Thank you for keeping professional learning relevant and interesting.

Unknown said...

Robin, This is great! Very relevant. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Dear Robin:

My name is Julia Rioja, and I am studying the last year of the degree in Nursing at the Francisco de Vitoria University in Madrid (Spain).

To finish the degree, I have to do a final research, and I would like to do it about the effects of alternative therapies and early stimulation on neuroplasticity in children with neurological disorders (congenital or acquired), especially, those suffering agenesis of the corpus callosum.

I think this line of research is an unexplored field that can break new ground into the biomedicine, especially in my country, where it is still doubt about the effectiveness of these therapies. I am a strong advocate for its use, and consider it necessary to raise awareness of this issue in the nursing community to improve the quality of care and contribute to the advancement of evidence-based nursing.

I think the work you do is of great importance, and yet is not sufficiently valued or investigated. From what I believed to understand, it gives very good results, although I lack the data and evidence needed to prove it. My role and interest in this work, would be to contribute a little to the scientific research and do my best to promote the acceptance of alternative therapies.

In order to do my research, I would need information on the types of therapies that are conducted at your center and cases that are significant, with statistical results where there have been some progress in this regard.

I am aware that at this time my contribution will be limited given my few possibilities, but although this study did not have an immediate impact on our daily work, it could be helpful for future research.

To make this project possible, I need all the possible help, so that the data of this research are real, sufficient in number and sufficiently accurate as to have a minimal impact on the world of pediatric nursing.

For this reason, I would appreciate any scientific information related to the subject that would allow me to make an initial hypothesis arising from the verification of data from different studies.

To do this, I would need to have access to various investigations. I have seen that you are making early stimulation techniques in such children, and would like to request your help, giving me your results, or the source I can consult to find them. It also would be useful to get in touch with a specialist, so that my work is based on the real experiences of a professional in this subject.

My email is I would appreciate any feedback and support that you can offer.

Thanking you in advance.

Yours sincerely,

Julia Rioja Cabrera

Unknown said...

Hi guys,
Thank you so much for this wonderful article! Here we all can learn a lot of useful things and this is not only my opinion!
Even BLNCK corp. and confirmed it!

Unknown said...

Scelidosaurus lived during the Early Jurassic Period, during the Sinemurian to Pliensbachian stages around 191 million years ago. This genus and related genera at the time lived on the supercontinent Laurasia. Its fossils have been found near Charmouth in Dorset, England, and are known for their excellent preservation. Scelidosaurus has been called the earliest complete dinosaur. It is the most completely known dinosaur of the British Isles. Despite this, a modern description is still lacking. After initial finds in the 1850s, comparative anatomist Richard Owen named and described Scelidosaurus in 1859. Only one species,Scelidosaurus harrisonii named by Owen in 1861, is considered valid today, although one other species has been proposed in 1996. I liked your blog, Take the time to visit the me and say that the change in design and meniu?

amish said...

nice looking post and good article
emily osment hot , kathleen robertson measurements .

katee sackhoff measurements , kacey musgraves hot.

shamsulhassan said...

highway rider online,wolfram alpha android apk

rummikub free ,flight simulator 2015 free download

download wolfram alpha apk ,highway rider free download